|
楼主 |
发表于 2009-4-14 22:30:54
|
显示全部楼层
来自: 中国江苏南京
拓扑替康治疗小细胞肺癌的系统评价(PDF)《中国循证医学杂志》[ISSN:1672-2531/CN:51-1656/R]期数: 2007年03期 页码: 189-203 栏目: 二次研究 出版日期: 2007-03-25
文章信息/Info
Title: Topotecan for Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review
作者: 王晓珊1;吴泰相2*;侯梅1
1. 四川大学华西医院肿瘤中心(成都 610041)
2. 四川大学华西医院循证医学与临床流行病学中心(成都 610041)
Author(s): WANG Xiao-shan1;WU Tai-xiang2*;HOU Mei1
1. Clinical Oncology Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China;
2. Chinese Evidence-Based Medicine Center/INCLEN CERTC, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
关键词: 拓扑替康; 小细胞肺癌; 治疗; 系统评价
Keywords: Topotecan; Small cell lung cancer; Treatment; Systematic review
分类号: -
DOI: -
文献标识码: A
摘要: 目的 系统评价拓扑替康在小细胞肺癌治疗中的临床疗效和安全性, 一线及二线治疗中的地位, 不同给药方式的疗效及其毒副作用。
方法 采用Cochrane系统评价方法,检索Cochrane图书馆临床对照试验库、MEDLINE、EMbase、Cancerlit、CBM、CNKI和VIP等电子数据库,并辅以手工检索和附加检索。检索时间截至2006年。由2名评价者独立评价并交叉核对纳入研究质量,对同质研究采用RevMan 4.2.8软件进行Meta分析。
结果 共纳入14个研究,2 099例小细胞肺癌患者,所有研究均报道采用了随机方法,均未详细报道随机方案的隐藏情况及是否采用盲法。Meta分析结果表明,TP 方案(拓扑替康+顺铂)与EP方案(足叶乙甙+顺铂)的反应率相似 [OR 0.83, 95%CI (0.63,1.09)],但具有相对高的致血小板下降的骨髓毒性;单药拓朴替康与CE方案(足叶乙甙+卡铂)的反应率相似 [OR 0.59, 95%CI (0.22,1.60)];TEP方案(拓扑替康+足叶乙甙+顺铂)与EP方案的反应率相似 [OR 1.37, 95%CI (0.82,2.28)],TEP方案致化疗后重度白细胞下降、重度血小板下降、重度血红蛋白下降均高于EP方案;口服拓扑替康与静脉滴注拓扑替康的化疗后反应率 [OR 0.97, 95%CI (0.60,1.57)]、中位疾病进展期 [WMD –2.32, 95%CI ( –5.72, 1.09)]、中位生存期 [WMD –1.65, 95%CI (–7.13,3.83)] 相似,口服拓扑替康化疗后重度中性粒细胞下降明显低于静脉滴注拓扑替康。所有研究共报道了45例治疗相关性死亡。
结论 拓扑替康治疗小细胞肺癌有确切临床疗效,无论是单药还是与其他药物的联合用药均具有与当前一线经典方案相当的疗效,但具有相对高的致白细胞和血小板下降的骨髓毒性,已被认为是治疗化疗敏感的小细胞肺癌患者复发的二线推荐药物,但是作为一线用药仍然需要更多的实践来证实。但由于纳入的研究存在选择性偏倚和测量性偏倚的高度可能性,势必影响结果的论证强度,期待更多高质量的随机双盲对照试验提供高质量的证据。
Abstract: Objective To evaluate the role of topotecan in the treatment of small cell lung cancer (SCLC).
Methods Up to 2006, we searched The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMbase, Cancerlit, CBM, CNKI and VIP. Handsearch and additional search were also conducted. The quality of included studies was evaluated and meta-analyses were performed for the results of homogeneous studies by RevMan 4.2.8 software.
Results Fourteen studies involving 2 099 participants with SCLC were included. All included studies were adequate in reporting randomization, while inadequate in allocation concealment and blinding. Meta-analyses showed that the response rate of TP (topotecan + cisplatin) regimen had no significant difference compared with EP regimen (etoposide + cisplatin) with OR 0.83 and 95%CI 0.63 to 1.09, but myelo-suppression such as leucopenia and thrombopenia was more severe with TP regimen; the response rate of monotherapy with topotecan was similar with that of CE (carboplatin + etoposide) regimen with OR 0.59 and 95%CI 0.22 to 1.60; the response rate of TEP (topotecan + etoposide + cisplatin) regimen was comparable with that of EP regimen with OR 1.37 and 95%CI 0.82 to –2.28, but myelosuppression and anemia were more severe with TEP regimen; the response rate with OR 0.97 and 95%CI 0.60 to –1.57, median time to progression with WMD –2.32 and 95%CI –5.72 to 1.09 and median survival time with WMD –1.65 and 95%CI –7.13 to 3.83 of IV topotecan were similar to those of oral topotecan, while neutropenia was more severe with IV topotecan. Forty-five treatment-related deaths were reported in all included studies.
Conclusions Topotecan is an effective agent for SCLC when used as monotherapy or in combined treatment, but myelosuppression such as leucopenia and thrombopenia was relatively severe. Although it has been recommended as a second-line agent for recurrence of sensitive SCLC, more clinical trials are needed to define its role in first-line treatment. Due to a high risk of selection bias and detection bias in included studies, the evidence is insufficient to determine the effect of topotecan. Further large-scale trials are required to define the role of topotecan in the treatment of SCLC.
参考文献/References
1 American Cancer Society: Cancer Facts and Figures 2006. Atlanta, Ga; American Cancer Society, 2006. [2006-08-07]. http://www.cancer.org,Last accessed August 7, 2006.
2 中国抗癌协会临床肿瘤学协作专业委员会. 2006年. http://www.csco.net.cn. (常规每年更新).
Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology. 2006. http://www.csco.net.cn. (Updated yearly).
3 汤钊猷, 朱世能, 曹世龙. 主编. 现代肿瘤学. 第2版. 上海: 上海医科大学出版社, 2000. 876.
Tang ZY, Zhu SN, Cao SL. Editor-in-Chief. Modern Oncology. 2nd Edition. Shanghai: Publishing Company of Shanghai Medical University, 2000. 876.
4 Okuno SH, Jett JR. Small cell lung cancer: current therapy and promising new regimens. The Oncologist, 2002, 7: 234–238.
5 Schiller JH. Current standards of care in small-cell and non-small-cell lung cancer. Oncology, 2001, 61(Suppl 1): 3–13.
6 von Pawel J. The role of topotecan in treating small cell lung cancer: second-line treatment. Lung Cancer, 2003, 41(Suppl 4): S3–S8.
7 Topotecan. An Oncologist’ View.Centre Francois Baclesse, Centre Régional de Lutte Contre le Cancer, Caen, France. The Oncologist, 1998, 3: 390–402.
8 Depierre A, von Pawel J, Hans K, et al. Evaluation of topotecan (Hycam-tin(TM)) in relapsed small cell lung cancer (SCLC). A multicentre phase II study. Lung Cancer, 1997, 18(Suppl 1): 35.
9 Ardizzoni A, Hansen H, Dombernowsky P, et al. Topotecan, a new active drug in the second-line treatment of small-cell lung cancer: a phase II study in patients with refractory and sensitive disease. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Early Clinical Stud-ies Group and New Drug Development Office, and the Lung Cancer Cooperative Group. J Clin Oncol, 1997, 15: 2090–2096.
10 Perez-Soler R, Glisson BS, Lee JS, et al. Treatment of patients with small-cell lung cancer refractory to etoposide and cisplatin with the topoisomer-ase I poison topotecan. J Clin Oncol, 1996, 14: 2785–2790.
11 Sandler AB. Chemotherapy for small cell lung cancer. Semin Oncol, 2003, 30: 9–25.
12 Ardizzoni A, Hansen H, Dombernowsky P, et al. Topotecan, a new active drug in the second-line treatment of small-cell lung cancer: a phase II study in patients with refractory and sensitive disease. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Early Clinical Studies Group and New Drug Development Office, and the Lung Cancer Cooperative Group. J Clin Oncol, 1997, 15: 2090–2096.
13 Depierre A, von Pawel J, Hans K, et al. Evaluation of topotecan in relapsed small cell lung cancer (SCLC). A (Hycamtin multicentre phase II study. Lung Cancer, 1997, 18(Suppl 1): 35.
14 Eckardt J, Gralla R, Palmer MC, et al. Topotecan (T) as secondline therapy in patients (Pts) with small cell lung cancer(SCLC): a phase II study. Ann Oncol, 1996, 7(Suppl 5): 107.
15 von Pawel J, Schiller JH, Shepherd FA, et al. Topotecan versus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and vincristine for the treatment of recurrent small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol, 1999, 17: 658–667.
16 Korfel A, Oehm C, von Pawel J, et al. Response to topotecan of symptomatic brain metastases of small-cell lung cancer also after whole-brain irradiation: a multicentre phase II study. Eur J Cancer, 2002, 38: 1724–1729.
17 Wong ET, Berkenblit A. The role of topotecan in the treatment of brain metastases. The Oncologist, 2004, 9: 68–79.
18 Bahadori HR, Green MR, Catapano CV. Synergistic interaction between topotecan and microtubule-interfering agents. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol, 2001, 48: 188–196.
19 Nagourney RA, Sommers BL, Harper SM, et al. Ex vivo analysis of topotecan: advancing the application of laboratory-based clinical therapeutics. Br J Cancer, 2003, 89: 1789–1795.
20 Jonsson E, Fridborg H, Nygren P, et al. Synergistic interactions of combinations of topotecan with standard drugs in primary cultures of human tumor cells from patients. Eur J Clin Pharmacol, 1998, 54: 509–514.
21 Greco FA. Topotecan as first-line therapy for small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer, 2003, 41(Suppl 4): S9–S16.
22 Alderson P, Green S, Higgins JPT, editors. Cochrane Reviewer’s Handbook 4.2.2 (updated March 2004). The Cochrane Library. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2004.
23 Higgins JPT, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med, 2002, 21(11): 1539–1558
24 Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, et al. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple,graphical test. BMJ, 1997, 315(7109): 629–634.
25 康平, 于起涛, 李志革. 拓扑替康联合顺铂治疗小细胞肺癌临床观察. 广西医学, 2002, 24(10): 1541~1542.
Kang P, Yu QT, Li ZG. Clinical observation of topotecan and cisplatin combination chemotherapy for small cell lung cancer. Guangxi Medical Journal, 2002, 24(10): 1541–1542.
26 刘文, 刘勇, 谷仲平, 等. 拓扑替康联合顺铂在小细胞肺癌术前新辅助化疗效果和耐受性. 中国误诊学杂志, 2004, 4(11): 1790~1792.
Liu W, Liu Y, Gu ZP, et al. Comparative study on topotecan plus cisplatin as preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy for small cell lung cancer. Chinese Journal of Misdiagnostics, 2004, 4(11): 1790–1792.
27 高亚杰, 刘基巍, 班丽英, 等. 国产盐酸拓扑替康治疗小细胞肺癌的临床研究. 中国现代实用医学杂志, 2004, 3(16): 11~12.
Gao YJ, Liu JW, Ban LY, et al. Clinical study of domestic topotecan hydrochloride in the treatment of small cell lung cancer. Chinese Journal of Current Practical Medicine, 2004, 3(16): 11–12.
28 李蓉, 杨谨, 李恩孝, 等. 国产盐酸拓扑替康治疗小细胞肺癌Ⅱ期临床试验. 中国新药杂志, 2001, 10(10): 760~763.
Li R, Yang J, Li EX, et al. Phase Ⅱ clinical trial of domestic TPT (topotecan) hydrochloride. Chinese New Drugs Journal, 2001, 10(10): 760–763.
29 束永前, 仇金荣, 刘连科, 等. 拓扑替康、依托泊甙联合顺铂治疗小细胞肺癌的临床观察. 临床肿瘤学杂志, 2004, 9(1): 5~7.
Su YQ, Chou JR, Liu Lk, et al. Clinical observation of topotecan and etoposide plus cisplatin in treating small cell lung cancer. Chinese Clinical Oncology, 2004, 9(1): 5–7.
30 膝月娥, 刘云鹤, 郑美珍, 等. 拓扑替康联合顺铂与足叶乙甙联合顺铂一线治疗小细胞肺癌的临床比较研究. 中国医科大学学报, 2005, 34(3): 269~270.
Qi YE, Liu YH, Zheng MZ, et al. Clinical comparative study of topotecan/etoposide vs. etoposide/cisplatin as first-line treatment in patients with small cell lung cancer. Journal of China Medical University, 2005, 34(3): 269–270.
31 马书仁. 盐酸拓扑替康顺铂治疗小细胞肺癌. 医药论坛杂志, 2003, 24(6): 41.
Ma SR. Topotecan hydrochloride in combination with Cisplatin in patients with small cell lung cancer. Journal of Medical Forum, 2003, 24(6): 41.
32 史鹤玲, 朱允中, 刘哲, 等. 盐酸拓扑替康治疗小细胞肺癌临床研究. 北京医学, 2002, 24(4): 251~253.
Shi HL, Zhu YZ, Liu Z, et al. Study on topotecan in the treatment of small-cell lung cancer. Beijing Medical Journal, 2002, 24(4): 251–253.
33 徐建华, 周均田, 周文伟, 等. 拓扑替康联合顺铂治疗小细胞肺癌的临床研究. 肿瘤研究与临床, 2005, 17(1): 35~36.
Xu JH, J Zhou JT, Zhou WW, et al. Clinical study of topotecan plus cisplatin in patients with small cell lung cancer. Cancer Research and Clinic, 2005, 17(1): 35–36.
34 Eckardt JR, von Pawel J, Papai Z, et al. Open-label, multicenter, randomized, phase Ⅲ study comparing oral topotecan/ cispl atin versus etoposide/ cisplatin as treatment for chemotherapy-naive patients with extensive-disease small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol, 2006, 24(13): 2044–2051.
35 Ignatiadis M, Mavroudis D, Veslemes M, et al. Sequential versus alternating administration of cisplatin/ etoposide and topotecan as first-line treatment in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: preliminary results of a Phase III Trial of the Hellenic Oncology Research Group. Clin Lung Cancer, 2005, 7(3): 183–189.
36 Greco FA, Thompson DS, Morrissey LH, et al. Paclitaxel/ carboplatin/ etoposide versus paclitaxel/ topotecan for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: a Minnie Pearl Cancer Research Network randomized, prospective phase II trial. Oncologist, 2005, 10(9): 728–733.
37 Quoix E, Breton JL, Gervais R, et al. A randomised phase II study of the efficacy and safety of intravenous topotecan in combination with either cisplatin or etoposide in patients with untreated extensive disease small-cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer, 2005, 49(2): 253–261.
38 Seifart U, Jensen K, Ukena J, et al. Randomized phase II study comparing topotecan/ cisplatin administration for 5 days versus 3 days in the treatment of extensive stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Lung Cancer, 2005, 48(3): 415–422.
39 Schaefer PL, Marks RS, Mahoney MR, et al. Randomized phase II study of daily versus continuous-infusion schedules of topotecan in the treatment of extensive-stage small cell lung cancers. Am J Clin Oncol, 2003, 26(3): 236–240.
40 Schiller JH, Adak S, Cella D, et al. Topotecan versus observation after cisplatin plus etoposide in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: E7593--a phase III trial of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol, 2001, 19(8): 2114–2122.
41 von Pawel J, Gatzemeier U, Pujol JL, et al. Phase Ⅱcomparator study of oral versus intravenous topotecan in patients with chemosensitive small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol, 2001, 19(6): 1743–1749.
42 von Pawel J, Schiller JH, Shepherd FA, et al. Topotecan versus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and vincristine for the treatment of recurrent small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol, 1999, 17(2): 658–667.
43 Miller AA, lilenbaum RC, Lynch TJ, et al. Treatment related fatal sepsis from topotecan/ cisplatin and topotecan/ paclitaxel. J Clin Oncol, 1996, 14(6): 1964–1965.
44 Lyss AP, Herndon JE, Lynch TJ, et al. Novel doublets in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: a randomized phase II study of topotecan plus cisplatin or paclitaxel (CALGB 9430). Clin Lung Cancer, 2002, 3(3): 205–210; discussion 211–212.
45 Lena H, Breton J, Yu W, et al. Randomized, phase II study of topotecan/ paclitaxel versus cispaltin/etoposide in patients with untreated, extensive disease, small cell lung cancer (SCLC).European Journal of Cancer, 2001, 37(Suppl 6): S62.
46 Seifart U, Fink U, Hans K, et al. Topotecan/ carboplatin 5 days vs topotecan/ carboplatin 3 days in patients with metastasic small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol, 2003, 22: (abstr 2630).
47 Eckardt J, von Pawel J, Hairsworth J, et al. Single agent oral topotecan (PO) versus intravenous topotecan (IV) in patients (pts) with chemosensitive small cell lung cancer (SCLC). An international phase III study. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol, 2003, 22: 619. Abstract 2488.
48 Kelli C, Sharon P. A Randomized Phase 2 Trial Comparing Amrubicin Versus Topotecan as Second-Line Treatment in Patients With Extensive Small Cell Lung Cancer Sensitive to First-Line Chemotherapy. http://www.ClinicalTrials.gov,processed this record on 2006-10-13.
49 Joseph A, Eric R. Phase II Randomized Study of Topotecan, Cisplatin, and Etoposide and Irinotecan, Cisplatin, and Etoposide in Patients With Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. http://www.ClinicalTrials.gov,verified this record on 2006-9-30.
50 Nathan L, Phase III Randomized Study of Cisplatin and Oral Topotecan Versus Cisplatin and Etoposide in Patients With Chemotherapy-Naive Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer. http://www.ClinicalTrials.gov, On 2006-12-05.
51 Nathan L, Phase III Randomized Study of Oral Versus Intravenous Topotecan in Patients With Limited or Extensive Small Cell Lung Cancer That Has Relapsed Following First Line Therapy, http://www.ClinicalTrials.gov, On 2006-12-05.
52 Hazel B, Paul W, David K. A Randomized Phase II Study of Picoplatin or Topotecan Second-Line Therapy for Subjects With Resistant or Refractory Small Cell Lung Cancer. http://www.ClinicalTrials.gov, On 2006-03-24.
53 Nathan L. Combination chemotherapy in treating patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer, http://www.ClinicalTrials.gov, On 2006-12-05.
54 Joseph A, Eric HR. Comparison of Two Combination Chemotherapy Regimens in Treating Patients With Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer. http://www.ClinicalTrials.gov, On 2006-12-05. |
|